ClassyArts Blog

November 23, 2009

Nineteenth Century Cleveland Ohio Photographers

Filed under: Photographers — ajmorris @ 1:09 pm

A Work in Progress

One of the nice things about the ClassyArts photographers database is that you can often follow the movements of photographers from one location to the next. Some of these guys moved so often, I suspect they specialized in finding good potential studio sites, setting up business there, then selling the operating studio at a profit. Of course, other photographers were as geographically stable as farmers, tied to one location for decades.

I always have several projects going at once, and right now one of those projects is an ebook publication: Nineteenth Century Cleveland Ohio Photographers, which I expect to finish sometime in 2010, though it could go into 2011 — there have been far more photographers active there than I expected when I started the project. To date, I have a list of almost 700 photographers who worked in Cleveland prior to 1900! I have written biographical sketches for about 40 of those so far. I’ve been working on this project a little over three months, though I only got to the point of actually writing sketches a month ago — before that it was all background research.

How This eBook is Different

Two features will distinguish this project from similar books on photographers that have been produced by others. For photographers who had their own studios my emphasis is on helping to date their images, so I pay particular attention to finding the dates of operation at each different studio address. Secondly, the dating goal is further supported by an initial summary table, and illustrations of as many different examples of imprints as I can find for each photographer.

Below is an example of an entry for one photographer, M E Beckwith. His career spanned from late in the daguerrian era to his death in 1887 — and he seems to have had only one studio location, though the address was changed over the years. Obviously, there are more example photographs for such a long-standing operator than the average photographer, but I’m sure there are other imprint types yet to be found.

You Can Help

If you have any 19th century photographs from Cleveland, and would like to contribute copies for publication in this ebook, please contact me.

Also, use the comment form below to let me know what you think of this layout — beginning with a summary table, color coded to show birth and death, life events and photographic data; followed by a short biographical sketch with source citations, and finally small reproductions showing the different imprints found. Those small images will probably be linked to larger images on the ClassyArts site in the final version.

Sample Record


Beckwith, Marvin Edward

M E Beckwith, M E Beckwith & Son, Marvin E Beckwith
1823Nov4 Clarence, New York born to Alva and Hannah (Brush) Beckwith
1845Jan23 Cleveland, OH married Margaret Sophia McLeod
1846-50 Cleveland, OH occupation tailor
1855 Cleveland, OH learned daguerrotype process from Samuel Crobaugh
1859-ca1870 9 Pearl, Cleveland, OH M E Beckwith photo studio
ca1868-1870 119 Detroit, Cleveland, OH M E Beckwith photo studio (from CDV imprint)
1871-ca1876 corner Pearl and Detroit, Cleveland, OH M E Beckwith and Son photo studio
1877-80 175 Pearl (Pearl & Detroit), Cleveland, OH M E Beckwith and Son photo studio
1881-87 261 Pearl, Cleveland, OH M E Beckwith and Son photo studio, same studio — street renumbered
1887Dec13 Cleveland, OH died

BIOGRPHICAL

Marvin Edward Beckwith was born in Clarence, Erie county, New York on November 4, 1823. His parents were Alva Beckwith (1797-1835) and Hannah (or Maud) Brush (1800-) (1, 2). The family moved to Willoughby Ohio in the late 1820s, then Monroe Michigan in the early 1830s. Marvin is said to have moved to Cleveland in 1839 (3). M E Beckwith married Margaret Sophia McLeod at Cleveland, Jan 23, 1845 (1). Mrs Beckwith may have been related to ambrotypist Daniel F McLeod and/or photographer Norman E A McLeod — all three were born within a ten-year span in Canada, and lived in Cleveland before 1860.

Marvin Beckwith is first noted in city directories in 1846, where his occupation is listed as tailor, and residence is 68 Ontario Street North. In the 1850 census his occupation is again listed as tailor, and he and Margaret have two children, Harriet age 2 and Alva age 1. The genealogies list Willoughby Ohio as Alva’s birthplace, though the family was living in Cleveland before and after his birth.

Marvin Beckwith learned photography from Samuel Crobaugh, probably about 1855 (3). By the 1859 city directory he is listed with his own gallery at 9 Pearl street, and is residing at 113 Hanover. The 1860 census if the first of several records that get his first name wrong, listing him as Martin E Beckwith, Daguerrian Artist. We have (see illustrations) an example of his work during the Civil War, a CDV with a tax stamp marked 1865, and the imprint shows he was still at 9 Pearl at that time. Another of our illustrations shows a late-1860s image with what Darrah described as a ‘Bilateral Ovoid’ imprint style, which shows M E Beckwith, 119 Detroit Street. As mentioned below, the 1870s studio had entrances on either Pearl or Detroit Streets. If this is (as I suspect) the same studio at the corner of Pearl and Detroit, then 119 Detroit may be the same location as 9 Pearl. An alternative explanation is that Beckwith moved from 9 Pearl to 119 Detroit, then to the corner of Pearl and Detroit.

The 1870 census again gets the name wrong, listing him as Myron E Beckwith, and shows his real estate valued at $7500, and personal assets at $800. The real estate may have included both his home and the studio location. Some directories about this time may list him as Marion E Beckwith, since others have copied that name — but I have not seen where that error originated. About 1870 or 1871, the business address begins being listed as ‘corner Pearl and Detroit’ — which may be the same location as 9 Pearl, but if so it was renumbered twice. From about 1877 the address is usually listed as 261 Pearl, but a late 1870 CDV (see illustrations) shows that this was the same location, listing not only ‘corner Pearl and Detroit streets’ but entrances at 175 Pearl or 186 Detroit. The Beckwiths also published local stereoviews in the 1870s, as evidenced by the illustrated example. The 1881 city directory listing shows the address as 261 Pearl (old address 175) showing that the street was renumbered about that time. Marvin is last listed in the 1887 city directory, living at 274 Hanover, which had been his address since 1884. Before that it was 115 Hanover, so that too may be due to street renumbering. In the 1888 city directory Sophia Beckwith, widow M E is listed at 274 Hanover. Marvin Edward Beckwith died December 13, 1887 (1). His son Alva took over the studio, listing it in the 1888 directory as Alva D Beckwith successor to M E Beckwith & Son; but from 1889 to 1891 he resumed using the title M E Beckwith & Son for the business, until he opened his own studio at another address about 1892.

SOURCES

NOTE: Census and Directory listings for Cleveland are not individually listed, they are referenced by year within the text. Directories are cited by year published, usually the year preceding that shown in the directory title.

  1. Marvin Beckwith and his wife Abigail Clark, Their Colonial Ancestors and Their Descendants; by A C Beckwith, Elkhorn WI 1899
  2. The Beckwiths, by Paul Edmond Beckwith. Albany, 1891. (384p.):120
  3. Craig’s Daguerreian Registry at http://craigcamera.com/dag/

IMAGES

Civil War Era Portrait

Civil War Era Portrait (dated 1865)

Civil War Era Portrait (dated 1865)

M E Beckwith, No 9 Pearl Street (ca 1859-70)
Vignetted CDV portrait of a woman, with a dated tax stamp on the back. The imprint reads: M E Beckwith, Photographer, No 9 Pearl St, West Side, Cleveland, Ohio. The two-cent tax stamp is initialed M E B and dated 1865.

Gaunt Faced Gentleman

Gaunt Faced Gentleman (ca 1868-70)

Gaunt Faced Gentleman (ca 1868-70)

M E Beckwith, No 119 Detroit Street (ca 1868-70)
This CDV portrait shows an elderly gentleman with hollowed cheeks. The imprint is in a bilateral ovoid with wide white outer border, a late 1860s style that occasionally is found in the very early 1870s as well. It reads: M E Beckwith, Photographer, 119 Detroit Street, Cleveland, Ohio. Negatives Preserved.

Rocky River Stereoview

Rocky River Stereoview (early 1870s)

Rocky River Stereoview (early 1870s)

M E Beckwith & Son, Corner Pearl & Detroit Streets (ca 1871-76)
A stereoview of the Rocky River with the town of the same name in the background, on an Orange card mount, with M E Beckwith and Son paper tag on the back.

Head with Charicature Body

Head with Charicature Body (ca 1875)

Head with Charicature Body (ca 1875)

Beckwith & Son, Corner Pearl & Detroit Streets (ca 1871-76)
Unusual CDV portrait with a gentleman wearing a Derby hat, his head superimposed on a charicature drawing of a man in a comical donkey cart. Back imprint has the address as ‘Corner Pearl & Detroit Streets’ but notes two entrances: 175 Pearl or 186 Detroit.

Young and Pretty Woman

Young and Pretty Woman (ca 1887)

Young and Pretty Woman (ca 1887)

M E Beckwith & Son, S W Corner Pearl & Detroit Streets, Phone: 1664 (1871-87)
Cabinet card portrait of a young woman, on a dark chocolate brown card with gilt border. The back imprint includes a phone number, but not the street number, just ‘S W Corner Pearl & Detroit Streets’ again, though by this time the address 261 Pearl was used in directory listings. Presence of a phone number confirms the late 1880s date however. The front imprint is greatly enlarged and lightened, and repeated at the bottom of this view.

Little Boy

Little Boy (ca 1890)

Little Boy (ca 1890)

M E Beckwith & Son
This cabinet card portrait was probably taken after M E Beckwith died — his son continued to use the name M E Beckwith & Son for a few more years (1888-90). This image was found for sale on eBay, so we don’t know if the back was blank or the seller simply did not show it. The front imprint does not include a street address, but only reads M E Beckwith & Son, Cleveland, O. There is a monogram included, but it just has B & S for Beckwith and Son.

November 16, 2009

Carte de Visite (CDV) Basics

Filed under: Carte de Visite — ajmorris @ 6:44 pm
Hand Tinted CDV by Charles K Bill of New York NY

Hand Tinted CDV by Charles K Bill of New York NY

This is the first in a series of posts devoted to general descriptions of the most common types of antique photographs. The carte de visite was one of the first photographic styles that was mass-produced, and owes its early popularity more to its low price and ease of reproduction than to the quality of image. Despite that generality, there were some very beautiful photographs produced in this format.

The original size of a carte de visite was a paper print 2-1/8 x 3-1/2 inches mounted on a card sized 2-1/2 x 4 inches. The size of the print varied somewhat from one photographer — indeed from one print — to the next, but the card mount was fairly consistent, varying only slightly. Early cards were cut by the photographer from larger pieces of ‘Bristol board’ (thin cardboard), and so varied more than cards from a year or two later, which were mass produced. Many CDVs, especially those from the 1860s, are slightly smaller today than when produced because consumers clipped the corners or trimmed one or more edges to make them slide into the pockets on album pages more easily.

Semantics

The term carte de visite is French for calling card, and reflects the size, rather than function, of the card-mounted image. That term also reflects the French origin of the style. Sometimes the term is hyphenated — carte-de-visite — rather than spelled as three words. From early in its popularity, the carte de visite has been called by the initials — CDV. A few people use CdV or cdv, but usually all the letters are capitalized.

The plural form is more difficult. When writing out the full name, most people use cartes de visite, but following that logic the plural abbreviation would be CsDV, which is unwieldy and confused looking. The plural CDVs is much more common and sensible appearing, but implies the full plural term should be carte de visites. For English speakers use of cartes de visite as the plural requires translating the the term to ‘calling card’ — pluralized as ‘calling cards’ then translated back to French. The hyphenated form shows that many people consider the term just one word, and so the correct plural in English should be carte de visites.

1868 tintype of Susana Krup in CDV size card mount with embossed frame

1868 tintype of Susana Krup in CDV size card mount with embossed frame

Carte de visite sized mounts were used for other types of photographs, but to be 100% correct in terminology, these should not be referred to as CDVs, but as ‘tintype in CDV sized mount’ or ‘gem sized image on CDV sized card mount’ or some such qualifying statement. Since the exact size of the CDV print varied, I have developed a simple rule for all CDVs, Cabinet Cards, Boudoir, and other named formats from the 1860s through 1880s (things become more complex in the 1890s with a profusion of names for card mounted images): the photograph width must be 90% or more of the total cardstock width (narrower dimension). This eliminates much confusion, particulary with regard to true cabinet cards, and post-1900 photographs mounted on a cabinet-card sized mat.

Carte de Visite History

P T Barnum CDV Image from 1862

P T Barnum CDV Image from 1862

The origin of the CDV is attributed to Disdéri, who patented the style in 1854. As with any innovation, it took a while to catch-on, and only came into common use in Europe around 1859, and in North America about 1860. That it gained rapidly in popularity can be deduced from the vast numbers of such cards dating from the early 1860s that can be found today.

Earlier photographs were mostly daguerreotypes, ambrotypes, and tintypes — each of which are unique in that they were produced directly in the camera, without any intervening negative form. CDVs were mostly albumen prints — produced on paper from a glass plate negative. That means that dozens or hundreds of copies could be produced quickly and efficiently, leading to quantity discounts and low production costs. The CDV format was used for private portraits in the millions, as well as celebrity photos and scenic views.

Civil War Soldiers in Uniform

Civil War Soldiers in Uniform

In the United States, the rise in popularity of the carte de visite format coincided with the Civil War, which gave its own impetus to these cheap and convenient sized images. Young men leaving for the war left their images behind, and took with images of their loved ones. Soldiers patronized camp-following photographic tents to send their likenesses home to anxious parents and spouses — the flat card-mounted images were easy to mail. And the public at large gobbled up vast numbers of war-related images, particularly the leading characters such as Lincoln and the Generals on both sides of the conflict. To some extant actual battlefield images were produced on CDVs, but these were more popular, and dramatic, in the stereoview format.

Temporal Distribution

In 1866 a larger format of card mounted photograph was introduced, the cabinet card. Although characterized by some writers as an ‘instant success’ that format was actually quite slow to catch-on — but eventually it replaced the carte de visite as the most popular format. In the 1870s the larger cabinet cards were commonly used for scenic views, but CDVs still predominated in the portrait market. And to judge from surviving images, portraits outnumber scenic views at least 10 to one.

Early 1880s Carte de Visite

Early 1880s Carte de Visite

Finally, however, about 1880, people began to appreciate the larger format for portraits as well as scenery. The carte de visite died a very slow death however. It is not uncommon to find the exact same image in CDV and cabinet card format — the subject giving parents or spouse the fine cabinet card, while friends get the cheaper CDVs.

If one were to purchase a completely random selection of 100 American CDVs, 80% would probably date from the 1860s and 1870s (nearly evenly divided), while only 7% would be from 1880s (and more than half of those from 1880 to 1883), and the remaining 3% from 1890s. I have never seen an American CDV that I could firmly attribute to the 1850s, nor to post 1900, though no doubt a few such rare examples exist. I have seen French CDVs from the 1850s, and CDVs from several European cities that date to the 1900 to 1915 period.

Photographer Imprints

Four Photographer Imprints of Increasing Complexity from CDVs

Four Photographer Imprints of Increasing Complexity from CDVs

Early in the history of the carte de visite photographers realized that the standardized card mounts made a wonderful platform for self-promotion. Printers provided pre-cut card stock for mounting photographs with the name and address of the photographer printed on the back. They soon added an attractive front border of two thin gilt lines. A very small minority of photographers had their names and addresses printed on the front of the card.

As time went on the thickness of the card mount itself gradually increased, and the printing options expanded. The thin cardboard mount began to appear in different colors, and glossy surface papers were used for the upper layers of the cardboard. The photographers imprint was first surrounded with a simple cartouche, then increasingly complex graphics were included. For a while there was a return to simplicity, with just the photographer’s surname on the back of cards, in large flowing diagonal script.

The changing styles and motifs came and went, and today provide an important clue to for the dating of these old photographs. The nature and significance of those characteristics will be the subject of future posts, so be sure to bookmark this site and return regularly, or subscribe to our RSS feed.

November 9, 2009

ClassyArts Blog

Filed under: ClassyArts — ajmorris @ 12:05 pm
A J Morris and his lovely spouse

A J Morris and his lovely spouse

Welcome to our new ClassyArts blog. Our goal for this part of the site is to keep you informed on what is happening on the main site, and discuss the various topics of interest to users of that site.

Among those topics, dating and identifying old photographs will be a prominent feature. We will discuss here our ongoing research into the various characteristics and features that provide clues to when and how a particular photograph was taken.

Of course historic photographers have always been an important part of the ClassyArts site, and we will mention some of those here as well, with discussion on how and where we find the information about these — sometimes obscure — artists. The biographical details of some of the more colorful and interesting characters will also be featured in this section.

Various other topics related to the history of photography will be fair game for this blog, including topics like photo preservation and restoration, copying and digitizing old photographs, and copyright issues.

As we prepare an updated version of the ClassyArts site, to be introduced early in 2010, we have begun expanding and transferring our data on Little Known American Artists to a database that will be made available on the new site. So some discussion of 19th century American artists other than photographers will also find its way into these pages.

We also want your feedback and suggestions, which you can post as comments. If you have a particular photo you want help identifying, see the ‘about us’ page to find out how to submit it.

So be sure to bookmark this site and visit often. Over time, you will find tons of information here, and lots of pretty pictures.

Copyright © 2009 - 2010 by Andrew J Morris